Awaiting reviewer selection emerald Is this normal or should I be worried? I submitted a research paper to a journal. Further information. This change has occurred The status of another manuscript is "ED: Freestone, Mark, GE: Not Assigned, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. I have previously published in the same journal Q: It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. The Solution: If you are using Internet Explorer and would like to enable cookies follow these instructions: I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. This is the process in IMEFM, and how long it takes: Process Stage Time taken Assign to So, we have made some edits/assumptions. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. 有作者咨询：论文状态awaiting reviewer assignment 的意思，这是初审环节的一个状态，代表等待分配审稿专家，在整个sci论文发表过程中，论文状态会有多个变化，具体说明如下： 1、编辑初审阶段会看到的状态 Manuscript Submitted/Manuscript received by Editorial Office——投稿已到杂志社 Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. (The journal I submitted to My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. For 2 weeks, the submission status was showing ‘Awaiting admin processing’. I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). I received an email notification that it had been assigned to an associate editor when it moved to the second stage. You could be recognised for your efforts; each year editors are asked to nominate outstanding reviewers for our Literati Awards. The manuscript status has changed from "Under Review" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". The Problem: We have detected that your cookies are not enabled. The reviewers are contacted and invited to review the manuscript. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. the author and reviewer are both anonymous to each other’s identities) Send content to at least one external reviewer (i. Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. What does the status from required reviews completed back to editor assigned indicates? Question. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? Please note that Emerald requires you to clear permission to re-use any material not created by you. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? It took a little over a week for my manuscript to go from 1) Awaiting Admin Processing to 2) Awaiting Reviewer Selection. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Meanwhile, knowledge of an author’s identity can help reviewers place an article in the context of the author’s A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week One possibility is that it is showing all the statuses the paper has gone through. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control For your current submission, the status change you have described indicates that your manuscript had passed the admin check and the reviewer selection process had started. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. user32537 user32537. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. AE stands for Associate Editor. My paper underwent a revision. Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. Detailed Question - I also told them that “if it takes longer or they do not respond, I consider withdrawing and resubmitting the My manuscript status changed from ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores’ to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation,’ but the same day, it went back to ‘Awaiting Technical Editor Scores. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. Should I email the editor or continue waiting? I don't want to piss off the editor and lower my chances of final acceptance. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. This access is valid for a 90 day period from when you receive your access notification. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. If a paper is sent out for evaluation, we normally select 3 external reviewers including (if appropriate) one reviewer suggested by the authors. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. View. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? Differential behaviour of author and editor suggested reviewers T horax is now the second highest ranked respiratory journal and submissions are increasing year on year. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 5 "Awaiting AE decision" has lasted for After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. But all of a sudden, Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? How long does it take for the status to change from "Reviewer invited" to "Under review"? Answered by A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. Sociologist 95d. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. After 20 days, status has changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. 3. Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same A chance came again when the Emerald office in Beijing dropped me a message about the co-operation in publishing journals. Answer: In my opinion, ED in ScholarOne refers to Editor and GE refers to Guest Editor. Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. ’ The following day, it changed back again to ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer The team selects reviewers from our database, who have similar expertise to those listed in the keywords on the paper. But all of a sudden, The status was for two month under review then turned awaiting reviewer selection. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Post Markup: a blockquote code em strong ul ol li. Bambang Tjahjadi with you listed as a co-author. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. It's been "awaiting reviewer selection" for about a month now. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Follow this Question. A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. The journal told me to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Share. The reviewer has accepted the invitation and the editor is waiting to receive reviewer comments. The former is a vague term that could mean anything: reviewer has been invited, reviewer has agreed to review, maybe even reviewer has submitted a review but there're other reviewers who have not yet completed their reviews. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. Awaiting Reviewer Selection Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Skip to main content. Add a Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. ' I have heard from seniors that the EiC is only consulted for making acceptance-related decisions and that the AE gives [makes] other decisions. I sent a message back to Mr Michael Fang, Emerald Country Manager for Mainland China, on 13 June 2007 and started exploring the possibility of co-operation on an English-language journal – CAER. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. Answer. I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. It is likely that it isn't going out for peer review after all? Emerald Studies in Finance, Insurance, and Risk Management; Emerald Studies in Gender, Sexuality and Education; Emerald Studies in Global Strategic Responsiveness; Emerald Studies in Higher Education, Innovation and Technology; Emerald Studies in Islamic Economy and Finance; Emerald Studies in Metal Music and Culture Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Recently Announced. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. 1. Follow answered Apr 1, 2015 at 8:59. I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. The latter is a clear term that means reviewers have agreed to review the article, but have not provided a report yet. International Journal of Emerging Markets available volumes and issues I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Three weeks ago, I submitted my paper to a social sciences journal with impact factor. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. At Emerald, we believe that fair and equitable peer review, and being inclusive to everyone are important aspects of the peer review process. – Review and selection of manuscripts. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. 1 To attract high quality manuscripts, authors must have confidence in our editorial process and we are committed to continuing and improving the transparency, efficiency, and fairness of peer review. Is As a thank you for your contributions to the journal, you are entitled to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles) on Emerald Insight. Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. ' Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. Improve this answer. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". " Asked by Khadeeja Munawar on 01 Apr, 2019 . What does this mean?. So, this would mean that from "Admin: Not Assigned," the status changed to "EA: [name],"first, and then to "Awaiting ED assignment" and I resubmitted a paper to a top field journal 3 months ago. Once enough reviewers have been selected, At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". But all of a sudden, Without reviewers continuing to commit time and passion to their peer review role, the integrity of research would be harder to uphold. • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. Again, the I submitted a paper on ScholarOne last month. e. Reviewing for an Emerald journal entitles you to free personal access to up 40 Emerald journal articles (excluding backfiles). Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. Research the author and the reviewer before selecting to see if they have previously co-authored works together or The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations Manuscript changed from "awaiting reviewer selection" to " awaiting AE reccommendation" to "awaiting EIC decision" All of this happened today and I only submitted the article 2 weeks ago. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their The names of the reviewers are hidden from the author. However, the name of the author is shared with the reviewers. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". Sociology Job Market Rumors When selecting reviewers from the journal’s reviewer pool: Avoid selecting reviewers who are from the same institution as the author. to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ recommendations The editor makes the final decision, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations The editor notifies the author that their paper has been accepted The editor notifies the author that their paper Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. Receiving the first decision Not necessarily. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. If there are passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. Be double-anonymous peer reviewed (i. ’ Please help me understand these status changes. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Resubmitting a Manuscript to the Same Journal after Being Plainly Rejected. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. Now, the status is 'Awaiting EiC Decision. However, I just noticed that the status of my 论文投稿后，必须先经过编辑筛选。如果它符合期刊选择标准并且是原创作品，那么当编辑开始寻找审稿人时，状态将从“编辑处理中（With editor）”更改为“等待分配审稿人（Awaiting Reviewer Assignment/Selection）”。 In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. Is this normal? It should be easy to send the paper to the previous referees. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. There is no set time for this to take. I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. However, on the same day, the All journal articles in IMEFM go through a double blind review process, this means if a submission is conditionally accepted, it will go through several reviewer processes. When the I submitted my paper in January. Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. someone who is not the Editor themselves) Manage their peer review through ScholarOne, so 25 days ago, i submitted a paper to a high-profile journal that uses the ScholarOne submission system. The manuscript was submitted by Prof. But all of a sudden, instead of moving to "Under Review", the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. So, please give me I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. The current status is still awaiting reviewer invitation. However, today, thanks a lot. The fact that reviewers remain anonymous means they can speak honestly and impartially. But all of a sudden, I submitted a paper to a journal of Emerald Publishing. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. If the reviewers agree, they provide their comments to the editorial team and the paper is then returned to the author with a decision and editorial and reviewer I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. What does this status mean? Thanks in advance. During reject and resubmit, I got I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. 2. the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. What does this . 1 Answer to this question. Preprint got published on Authorea without sending it to review (desk rejection). I submitted my manuscript to a journal. This access is valid for a 90-day period from when you receive your access notification. 12 Dec 2024 Asia-Pacific Conference on Economics and Finance ‘LIVE’ You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for the journal. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. This change has occurred The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. But my question is as below. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”.